Pivot from the hardware/integrity layer to the parking operation. All wiki-only; no code yet. Core principle throughout: business entities are projections over the signed append-only event log, never mutable tables. New concepts: parking-session, tariff (composable/versioned, FX-ready), shift (manned-only Z-report), capacity-occupancy, validation-discounts, reporting-analytics, clock-integrity, ticket-encoding, anti-passback. New entities: permit, opencv-anpr-service, blocklist. Decisions: session-model, vision-service (host-side ANPR + vehicle verification; scoped AGPL exception for the isolated service). Updates: append-only-event-chain (new event types + vision witness), local-jwt-auth (drop 8h expiry -> until logout; code change pending), lpr-camera (host-side recognition supersedes edge-AI), standing-decisions (AGPL exception), open-questions (+FX, +pay-station money corners, backup). Deferred + flagged: intercom/help-call, receipts/refunds/change, FX engine, lane topology (#1).
6.9 KiB
type, tags, sources, updated
| type | tags | sources | updated | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| concept |
|
|
2026-06-15 |
Append-Only Event Chain
The core integrity mechanism against operator fraud (see threat-model). (See parking-system-architecture §3.)
Three layered properties:
- Append-only event model. Entry/exit events are never edited or deleted, only appended. A "void" is itself a recorded event, not an erasure.
- Tamper-evident chaining. Each event stores the hash of the previous event (a hash chain). Reordering or deleting breaks the chain visibly.
- Hardware-backed signing. The atecc608 secure element signs each event with a non-extractable key. This is what makes the chain unforgeable rather than merely self-consistent — someone who owns the machine still cannot forge a valid entry.
It only becomes trustworthy as an external fraud control when paired with reconciliation against an authority the operator can't alter. Every device event — including those ingested from the uhppote-controller via event-log-ingestion — should land in this host-side chain.
Implementation (apps/server)
Implementation-derived. The schema (
packages/dbevents) and types (packages/sharedParkingEvent) predate this; the writer/signer are new.
EventLog(apps/server/src/event-log.ts) is the append primitive.append()reads the latest row, setsindex = prev + 1,prevHash = sha256(canonical(prev))(genesis = null), signs the canonical form, and inserts. There are no update/delete paths.- Serialized appends. SQLite is single-writer, but read-prev → compute-hash → insert is
multi-step, so
EventLogalso guards it with an in-process async lock — otherwise two near- simultaneous events could claim the sameindexor chain off a staleprevHash. Verified: 5 concurrent appends produced indices 1..5 with an intact chain. - Canonical form is a fixed-order JSON array (
index,type,direction,lane,source,identity, occurredAt,prevHash) — byte-stable, since the chain + signatures depend on it. The volatile rowidis excluded; chain identity isindex+ content. verifyChain()walks oldest→newest, recomputing hashes + signatures. Catches tampered content (bad signature), reordering / a deleted row (indexgap), and aprevHashmismatch. Exposed atGET /api/events/verify(admin). Read access to the log:GET /api/events.
The Signer abstraction (software now, ATECC608 later)
Signing goes through a Signer interface (packages/shared) — the abstraction over the
atecc608. Because the chip being wired is still open-questions, the
server ships a SoftwareSigner (HMAC-SHA256, key from EVENT_SIGNING_KEY). Swapping to the
secure element is a new Signer impl with no EventLog change; each event stores its keyId
so old events stay verifiable.
⚠️ The software signer makes the chain self-consistent + tamper-evident, but not unforgeable by someone who owns the host — only the ATECC608's non-extractable key gives property (3) above. Until the chip is wired, the chain detects tampering by outsiders and accidental corruption, but an operator with the signing key + DB access could re-sign a forged chain. This is the central reason #6 matters.
What currently feeds the log
Dingtian input (button) pushes → bus → input_received events (see device-input-flow,
dingtian-relay). These are recorded faithfully as raw inputs, not as vehicle_entry —
the richer entry event waits for the entry flow (ticket print + barrier command).
Business-layer event types (designed, not yet implemented — see session-model). The
parking-session domain folds over these signed events, extending input_received:
vehicle_entry/vehicle_exit— a stay's endpoints;identitycarries the ticket id or plate.payment— a settled fee at the pay station, referencing the session it pays for (amount in integer minor units; see tariff). Making "paid" a signed event — not a mutable row — is the whole point: an operator can't forge it or silently delete it.void— a correction / lost-ticket write-off; like every other void here it is an appended event, never an erasure.
A session is a projection over this chain, never a mutable table — the same anti-fraud reason the chain exists. See parking-session.
laneis now resolved from the firing device. ALaneMap(apps/server/src/lane-map.ts) cacheslane_devices.id → lane, built at startup and refreshed by the setup routes on every assign/unassign. Device events carry the device instance id, not a lane; the handler looks it up. A device with no mapping (assigned without a lane, or a stale id) logslane: -1and a warning — never0, which is a real lane — and is still recorded (the chain is append-only; nothing is dropped).sourcestaysnullforinput_received, and deliberately so:sourceis anIdentitySource(wiegand | lpr | qr | ticket | manual) — how a vehicle was identified — not a device/IP field. A raw button push has no vehicle identity. The device provenance lives inidentity(e.g.dingtian:<id> input:1/on).
⚠️ Limitation: the log captures HOST-ORIGINATED actions only
The event log records what the host did (inputs it received, opens it commanded). It is
blind to out-of-band relay actuation — anything that fires a relay without going through the
host. Proven on hardware: a binary relay command sent directly to the device with the
(sniffable) relay_pw fired a relay and produced zero events. Out-of-band paths include:
- the password-less string protocol (until disabled — see dingtian-relay),
- a sniffed/replayed
relay_pwbinary command (plaintext UDP — relay control is defence-in-depth, not a boundary), - the device's own
ip_watchdog(auto-toggles a relay on ping-failure — must stay disabled), - a future
barrier_open_commandpath is host-side and would log; these bypass it.
So the log alone does not detect operator/attacker fraud at the relay. That is by design — the actual control is reconciliation: compare the host's signed commanded opens against an independent witness of opens that physically happened (a door/loop sensor on a Dingtian input → which DOES push + log; the opencv-anpr-service's plate and vehicle read; payment/Z-report). A physical open with no matching signed command is the fraud signal — and, with vehicle verification, a plate that enters/exits on a different car is too (the plate-spoofing case). Both the witness sources and the reconciliation logic are NOT yet built — this is the main open gap. Prevention (VLAN isolation so the attacker can't reach UDP 60000) is the necessary first line; detection-via-reconciliation is the backstop.