Files
processor/.planning/phase-1-throughput/07-position-writer.md
T
julian c314ba0902 Add planning documents for Phase 1 (throughput pipeline) and stub Phases 2-4
ROADMAP.md establishes status legend, architectural anchors pointing at the
wiki, and seven non-negotiable design rules — most importantly the
core/domain boundary that protects Phase 1 from Phase 2 churn, the
schema-authority split (positions hypertable owned here; everything else
owned by Directus), and idempotent-writes via (device_id, ts) ON CONFLICT.

Phase 1 (throughput pipeline) is fully detailed across 11 task files:
scaffold, core types + sentinel decoder, config + logging, Postgres
hypertable, Redis Stream consumer, per-device LRU state, batched writer,
main wiring, observability, integration test, Dockerfile + Gitea CI.
Observability is in Phase 1 (not deferred) — lesson learned from
tcp-ingestion task 1.10.

Phases 2-4 are stub READMEs. Phase 2 (domain logic) blocks on Directus
schema decisions and lists those open questions explicitly. Phase 3
(production hardening) and Phase 4 (future) sketch the task shape.
2026-04-30 21:16:59 +02:00

95 lines
4.6 KiB
Markdown

# Task 1.7 — Position writer (batched upsert)
**Phase:** 1 — Throughput pipeline
**Status:** ⬜ Not started
**Depends on:** 1.2, 1.4
**Wiki refs:** `docs/wiki/entities/postgres-timescaledb.md`
## Goal
Write batches of `Position` records into the `positions` hypertable using `INSERT ... ON CONFLICT (device_id, ts) DO NOTHING` for idempotency. Return per-record success/failure so the consumer (task 1.8) can decide what to ACK.
## Deliverables
- `src/core/writer.ts` exporting:
- `createWriter(pool, config, logger, metrics): Writer` — factory.
- `Writer` interface:
- `write(records: ConsumedRecord[]): Promise<WriteResult[]>` — inserts the batch, returns per-record results: `{ id: string; status: 'inserted' | 'duplicate' | 'failed'; error?: Error }`.
- `test/writer.test.ts` (mocked `pg.Pool`):
- Happy path: all records insert.
- Duplicate-key: `ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING` returns `'duplicate'` for those records.
- Mixed: half new, half duplicate.
- Pool error: all records in the batch return `'failed'`.
- Bigint attribute is stringified before serialization.
- Buffer attribute is base64-encoded before serialization.
## Specification
### SQL pattern
Use a single multi-row `INSERT` per batch with `RETURNING (xmax = 0) AS inserted`:
```sql
INSERT INTO positions (device_id, ts, latitude, longitude, altitude, angle, speed, satellites, priority, codec, attributes)
VALUES
($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6, $7, $8, $9, $10, $11),
($12, $13, $14, $15, $16, $17, $18, $19, $20, $21, $22),
...
ON CONFLICT (device_id, ts) DO NOTHING
RETURNING device_id, ts, (xmax = 0) AS inserted;
```
`xmax = 0` is true for newly-inserted rows, false for ones that hit `ON CONFLICT`. The `RETURNING` rows give us a lookup of which `(device_id, ts)` pairs were inserted vs. duplicates.
**Note:** rows that hit the conflict are NOT returned (Postgres doesn't return them with `ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING`). To distinguish duplicate from "new but hit a unique violation later," compare the returned rows against the input by `(device_id, ts)`. Anything in the input but missing from RETURNING is a `'duplicate'`.
### bigint and Buffer attribute encoding
Per task 1.4, `jsonb` storage:
- `bigint` → JSON string. Use a custom replacer in `JSON.stringify`:
```ts
JSON.stringify(attributes, (_k, v) =>
typeof v === 'bigint' ? v.toString() :
Buffer.isBuffer(v) ? v.toString('base64') : v
);
```
- `Buffer` → base64 string.
Document this in `wiki/concepts/position-record.md` as a follow-up — the on-disk shape differs slightly from the in-flight shape because JSON can't hold bigints or bytes natively.
### Batching strategy
The consumer (task 1.8) calls `write(batch)` with whatever batch the consumer received from `XREADGROUP`. Phase 1 doesn't internally batch further — the consumer's batch size (`BATCH_SIZE`, default 100) is the writer's batch size.
If `BATCH_SIZE > WRITE_BATCH_SIZE` (default 50), the writer chunks internally: split the input into chunks of `WRITE_BATCH_SIZE`, run them sequentially. Don't parallelize chunks against the same Pool — `pg.Pool` has bounded connections and we don't want to starve other queries (the migration runner, `/readyz` health checks, etc.).
### Per-record status
The consumer (task 1.8) takes the `WriteResult[]` and decides ACK:
- `'inserted'` and `'duplicate'` → ACK (we got the data into Postgres or already had it).
- `'failed'` → do not ACK (let it stay pending for retry).
If a transaction-wide failure occurs (Pool dead, transient network), all records in the chunk get `'failed'`. The consumer treats them all the same.
### Metrics emitted by this module
- `processor_position_writes_total{status="inserted"|"duplicate"|"failed"}` — counter
- `processor_position_write_duration_seconds` — histogram (per-batch latency)
## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] `pnpm typecheck`, `pnpm lint`, `pnpm test` clean.
- [ ] Mocked-Pool test verifies SQL parameter ordering and types are correct.
- [ ] Bigint and Buffer attributes serialize as expected via the JSON.stringify replacer.
- [ ] Mixed insert/conflict batch produces correct per-record `WriteResult[]`.
- [ ] Pool error → all records get `'failed'`; metrics reflect this.
## Risks / open questions
- **Parameter limit.** Postgres protocol allows max 65535 parameters per statement. With 11 columns per row, that caps us at ~5957 rows per statement. `WRITE_BATCH_SIZE=50` is well under. If the cap is ever raised, document the formula.
- **`RETURNING` cost.** On a hypertable with many chunks, `RETURNING` has near-zero overhead. Verify with a benchmark in task 1.10 (integration test).
## Done
(Fill in once complete: commit SHA, brief notes.)